4.7 Article

Risk assessment of exposure to indoor aerosols associated with Chinese cooking

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 197-204

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.12.013

关键词

PM2.5; metals; size distribution; cooking; health risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cooking is an important source of indoor aerosols in residential homes and buildings with non-smokers, and thus has public health implications. However, limited information is currently available in the published literature on the physical and chemical, characteristics of aerosols produced by gas cooking. Consequently, a comprehensive study was carried out to investigate the physical (number and mass concentrations and size distributions) and chemical (metals) properties in a typical Chinese food stall in Singapore where stir-frying in a wok is the most common cooking method using gas stove. To assess the contribution of cooking activities to indoor particle concentrations, aerosol measurements were performed in two distinct time periods, i.e., during cooking and non-cooking hours. The average mass concentrations of fine particles (PM2.5) and metals increased by a factor of 12 and 11, respectively. from 26.7 and 1.5 mu g m(-3) during non-cooking hours to 312.4 and 15.6 mu gm(-3) during cooking hours. The average number concentration was also elevated by a factor of 85, from 9.1 x 10(3) cm(-3) during non-cooking hours to 7.7 x 105 cm(-3) during cooking hours. Real-time particle measurements showed that about 80% of the particles associated with cooking are ultrafine particles in terms of particle counts. To evaluate the potential health threat due to inhalation of air pollutants released from gas cooking, the health risk estimates based on exposure and dose-response assessments of metals were calculated for a maximally exposed individual. The findings indicate that the indoor air quality existing at the food stall may pose adverse health effects over long-term exposure to cooking emissions. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据