期刊
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 330-336出版社
ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412
关键词
-
类别
Background Routine use of standardised outcome measures is not universal. Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of standardised outcome assessment. Method A randomised controlled trial, involving 160 representative adult mental health patients and paired staff (ISRCTNI6971059). The intervention group (n=101) (a) completed monthly postal questionnaires assessing needs, quality of life, mental health problem severity and therapeutic alliance, and (b) received 3-monthly feedback. The control group (n=59) received treatment as usual. Results The intervention did not improve primary outcomes of patient-rated unmet need and of quality of life. Other subjective secondary outcome measures were also not improved. The intervention reduced psychiatric inpatient days (3.5 v. 16.4 mean days, bootstrapped 95% CI 1.6-25.7), and hence service use costs were 2586 pound (95% CI 102-5391) less for intervention-group patients. Net benefit analysis indicated that the intervention was cost-effective. Conclusions Routine use of outcome measures as implemented in this study did not improve subjective outcomes, but was associated with reduced psychiatric inpatient admissions.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据