4.4 Article

Safety assessment of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads useful in crop production

期刊

ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY
卷 159, 期 2, 页码 291-301

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00498.x

关键词

Antibiotic susceptibility; biological control; Lemna minor; pathogenicity; PGPR; Pseudomonas; risk assessment; seed germination; Tetrahymena pyriformis; toxicity

资金

  1. Mistra (The Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One biocontrol and two plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas spp. isolates were subjected to a safety assessment. Potential risks for human and plant health were investigated and screenings for toxic effects were performed. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern was typical for Pseudomonas and only one of the isolates grew at 37 degrees C. None of the isolates elicited a hypersensitivity reaction in the tobacco test for plant pathogenicity. For toxicity testing, BACTOX, the Lemna growth bioassay, primary root and shoot growth in vitro and a seed germination/early seedling growth assay were performed. In these assays, one of the plant growth-promoting isolates consistently displayed concentration-dependent adverse effects not seen with the other isolates. Further investigation is needed to determine whether these adverse effects are a concern from a safety assessment perspective, as the identity and mode of action of the active metabolite(s) are unknown. Lack of standardised test procedures for complex samples of microbial origin hampered interpretation of the results from the toxicity assays and there is a need to develop methodology that is more suitable for testing such samples. Nevertheless, the tests employed for the three Pseudomonas isolates were successful in distinguishing isolates with different characteristics. This test framework provides an outline for information collection and safety evaluation when handling new microbial isolates that could be an efficient tool in selecting the best candidate isolates for product development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据