3.9 Article

Dermatologic adverse effects of lenalidomide therapy for amyloidosis and multiple myeloma

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 142, 期 10, 页码 1298-1302

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.142.10.1298

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To examine dermatologic adverse effects of lenalidomide in patients with amyloidosis and multiple myeloma and to determine whether the adverse effects are different when lenalidomide is used alone compared with when it is used in combination with dexamethasone. Design: Retrospective review of medical records. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Seventy- five patients with multiple myeloma and 23 patients with amyloidosis participating in clinical trials. Intervention: In the 75 patients with multiple myeloma, lenalidomide was the treatment in 24 and lenalidomide and dexamethasone in 51. In the 23 patients with amyloidosis, lenalidomide was used alone. Main Outcome Measures: The frequency, type, severity, and time of onset of all skin eruptions that were temporally related to lenalidomide treatment were recorded. Results: In the patients with amyloidosis treated with lenalidomide, 10 ( 43%) had rashes. In the patients with multiple myeloma, rashes occurred in 7 ( 29%) of those receiving lenalidomide alone and in 15 ( 29%) of those receiving lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The rashes were characterized as morbilliform, urticarial, dermatitic, acneiform, and undefined. Severe rashes required permanent discontinuation of lenalidomide therapy in 2 patients. In 23 patients ( 72%), rashes occurred in the first month after therapy was initiated; however, delayed- onset rashes occurred in 9 ( 28%). Conclusions: The prevalence of dermatologic adverse effects in patients receiving lenalidomide was higher in those with amyloidosis than in those with multiple myeloma. The prevalence of skin eruptions was not diminished by the concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids. Most skin eruptions were mild and did not necessitate withdrawal of lenalidomide therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据