4.6 Article

Daily to decadal sea surface temperature variability driven by state-dependent stochastic heat fluxes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 1940-1958

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO2948.1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The classic Frankignoul-Hasselmann hypothesis for sea surface temperature (SST) variability of an oceanic mixed layer assumes that the surface heat flux can be simply parameterized as noise induced by atmospheric variability plus a linear temperature relaxation rate. It is suggested here, however, that rapid fluctuations in this rate, as might be expected, for example, from gustiness of the sea surface winds, are large enough that they cannot be ignored. Such fluctuations cannot be fully modeled by noise that is independent of the state of the SST anomaly itself. Rather, they require the inclusion of a state-dependent (i.e., multiplicative) noise term, which can be expected to affect both persistence and the relative occurrence of high-amplitude anomalies. As a test of this hypothesis, daily observations at several Ocean Weather Stations (OWSs) are examined. Significant skewness and kurtosis of the distributions of SST anomalies is found, which is shown to be consistent with a multiplicative noise model. The observed wintertime SST distribution at OWS P is reproduced using a single-column variable-depth mixed layer model; the resulting non-Gaussianity is found to be largely due to the state dependence of rapidly varying (effectively stochastic) sensible and latent heat flux anomalies. The authors' model for the non-Gaussianity of anomalous SST variability (counterintuitively) implies that the multiplicative noise increases the persistence, predictability, and variance of midlatitude SST anomalies. The effect is strongest on annual and longer time scales and may, therefore, be important to the understanding and modeling of interannual and interdecadal SST and related climate variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据