4.3 Article

Clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical characteristics associated to recurrence/regrowth of craniopharyngiomas

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 108, 期 7, 页码 661-669

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.01.007

关键词

angiogenesis; craniopharyngiomas; cell proliferation; p53; prognosis; recurrence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Craniopharyngioma is a rare, benign epithelial brain tumor of the suprasellar region with a high rate of recurrence. Clinical and histopathological features that might be predictors of recurrence/regrowth have not been clearly delineated. Methods: We compared recurrence/regrowth of the tumors with the clinico-pathological characteristics, vascular density, cell proliferation index, and immunohistochemical profile (cytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen [EMA], carcinoembrionary antigen [CEA], and laminin) of 47 patients with craniopharyngioma followed for more than 5 years. Results: Tumors were adamantinomatous in 42 cases (89%) and papillary squamous in 5 cases (11%). Immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 8/18/19 was positive in 64%; cytokeratin 5 in 42%; laminin 8 in 62%; and CEA in 21%. The cell proliferation index and vascular density were greater in adamantinomatous than in papillary tumors (22 +/- 6 versus 17 +/- 3, p = 0.05; and 21 +/- 3 versus 17 +/- 3, p = 0.037, respectively); they were neither related to recurrence nor to regrowth. No significant differences were found between adamantinomatous and papillary tumors regarding the presence of cytokeratin, laminin, CEA or glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Recurrence rate at 5 years was 59%. No relation was found between recurrence and adjuvant radiotherapy (AR). Residual tumor after surgery, whorl-like arrays (p=0.04) and immunoreactivity for p53 (p = 0.022) were significantly related to recurrence/regrowth. Conclusions: Residual tumor after surgery, immunoreactivity to p53 and presence of whorl-like arrays are associated to recurrence/regrowth of craniopharyngioma. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据