4.6 Article

Anti-adipogenic regulation underlies hepatic stellate cell transdifferentiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 S102-S105

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04573.x

关键词

adipocyte; hepatic stellate cells; Ito cells; PPAR-gamma

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R24AA12885, P50AA11999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cirrhosis is the most important consequence of alcoholic liver disease for which liver transplantation is the only treatment option available. Transdifferentiation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC) to myofibroblastic cells (MF) is a central event in liver fibrogenesis, and understanding molecular mechanisms that underlie this cellular event provides pivotal insights into development of new therapeutic modalities for cirrhosis. To this end, the authors proposed several years ago that transdifferentiation of quiescent HSC to MF may be causally associated with transcriptional regulation known for adipocyte-preadipocytic fibroblast dedifferentiation. In support of this notion, the authors showed that adipogenic transcription factors and their downstream adipocyte specific genes are expressed abundantly in quiescent HSC and that this expression profile is lost in HM. Further, gain-of-function manipulations for adipogenic transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c have been shown to reverse culture-induced MF to quiescent HSC. The authors also demonstrated that tumor necrosis factor-alpha and Wnt, known mediators of anti-adipogenesis, also suppress the activity of PPAR-gamma and contribute to HSC-MF transdifferentiation. These results reinforce the concept of adipogenic regulation essential to the quiescent phenotype and the loss of such regulation underlying HSC-HM transdifferentiation. They also provide insights into the molecular basis for the use of PPAR-gamma agonists, which has been advocated for treatment of liver fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据