4.7 Article

Fecal energy losses in enterally fed intensive care patients: An explorative study using bomb calorimetry

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 758-764

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.11.012

关键词

critically ill; intensive care; nutrition; enteral nutrition; malabsorption; energy balance; bomb calorimetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Et Aims: Early enteral nutrition and tailored supply of nutrients have become standard in most of the intensive care units (ICU). So far little attention has been given to losses of energy in the stools. The purpose of this explorative study was to evaluate the energy tosses of patients with loose stools, necessitating the use of a feces-collector device in a tertiary academic ICU. Methods: In a group of 13 fully enterally fed and mechanically ventilated patients with loose stools, the daily energy toss in feces was determined, using bomb catorimetry. Malabsorption was defined as an absorption capacity of 85% or less. Energy expenditure was determined with indirect calorimetry. Results: Six out of 13 (46%) patients fulfilled the criterion of malabsorption. The mean total energetic absorption capacity was 84.6 +/- 13.3%. The mean capacity of absorption of fat was 89.7 +/- 16.3%. The caloric value of energy loss had a mean of 301 +/- 259 kcal/day. Fecal fat toss proved not to be a good indicator of total fecal energy loss. A total of 4/13 patients (31%) had a net negative energy balance of over 500kcal/day. A daily feces production of 250g or more was a good predictor of malabsorption. Energy toss could accurately be predicted by using a factor 4.87 for the combined energetic value of protein and carbohydrates, if dry weight and fecal fat content are known. Conclusions: In this clinical study on ICU patients with loose stools, malabsorption proved to be a frequently occurring and so far unrecognized problem, contributing strongly to negative energy balances in 1/3 of the patients. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据