4.6 Article

Dimerization of CXCR4 in living malignant cells: control of cell migration by a synthetic peptide that reduces homologous CXCR4 interactions

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 2474-2483

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0261

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 (CD184) may play a role in cancer metastasis and is known to form homodimers. However, it is not clear how transmembrane regions (TM) of CXCR4 and receptor homotypic interactions affect the function of CXCR4 in living cells. Using confocal microscopy and flow cytometric analysis, we showed that high levels of CXCR4 are present in the cytoplasm, accompanied by lower expression on the cell surface in CXCR4 transfectants, tumor cells, and normal peripheral blood lymphocytes. CXCR4 homodimers were detected in tumor cells, both on the cell surface membrane and in the cytoplasm using fluorescence resonance energy transfer and photo-bleaching fluorescence resonance energy transfer to measure energy transfer between CXCR4-CFP and CXCR4-YFP constructs. Disruption of lipid rafts by depletion of cholesterol with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin reduced the interaction between CXCR4 molecules and inhibited malignant cell migration to CXCL12/SDF-1 alpha. A synthetic peptide of TM4 of CXCR4 reduced energy transfer between molecules of CXCR4, inhibited CXCL12-induced actin polymerization, and blocked chemotaxis of malignant cells. TM4 also inhibited migration of normal monocytes toward CXCL12. Reduction of CXCR4 energy transfer by the TM4 peptide and methyl-beta-cyclodextrin indicates that interactions between CXCR4s may play important roles in cell migration and suggests that cell surface and intracellular receptor dimers are appropriate targets for control of tumor cell spread. Targeting chemokine receptor oligomerization and signal transduction for the treatment of cancer, HIV-1 infections, and other CXCR4 mediated inflammatory conditions warrants further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据