4.7 Article

Stellar populations in the nuclei of late-type spiral galaxies

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 649, 期 2, 页码 692-708

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505166

关键词

galaxies : nuclei; galaxies : spiral; galaxies : star clusters; galaxies : structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As part of an ongoing effort to study the stellar nuclei of very late type, bulge-less spirals, we present results from a high-resolution spectroscopic survey of nine such nuclear star clusters, undertaken with the VLT UVES. We fit the spectra with population synthesis models and measure Lick-type indices to determine mean luminosity-weighted ages, which range from 4.1 x 10(7) to 1.1 x 10(10) yr and are insensitive to assumed metallicity or internal extinction. The average metallicity of nuclear clusters in late-type spirals is slightly subsolar (< Z > = 0.015) but shows significant scatter. Most of the clusters have moderate extinctions of 0.1 - 0.3 mag in the I band. The nuclear cluster spectra are best described by age-composite stellar populations, as only such models yield mass-to-light ratios that match those obtained from dynamical measurements. For our nine sample clusters, the last star formation episode was on average 34 Myr ago, while all clusters experienced some star formation in the last 100 Myr. We thus conclude that the nuclear clusters undergo repeated episodes of star formation. Our results are robust to possible contamination from the underlying galaxy disk, as demonstrated by comparison to a similar analysis using smaller aperture spectra obtained with the HST STIS. Also considering the 2005 results from Walcher et al., we have thus shown that the stellar nuclei of bulge-less galaxies are massive and dense star clusters that form stars recurrently until the present day. This set of properties is unique among the various classes of star clusters. To elucidate whether and how these unique properties are related to the nuclear location of the cluster in its host galaxy remains a challenging question.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据