4.5 Article

A New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips

期刊

ANIMAL COGNITION
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 317-334

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0052-5

关键词

New Caledonian crows; tool use; tool modification; planning; folk physics

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C517392/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [BB/C517392/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C517392/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous observations of a New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) spontaneously bending wire and using it as a hook [Weir et al. (2002) Science 297:981] have prompted questions about the extent to which these animals 'understand' the physical causality involved in how hooks work and how to make them. To approach this issue we examine how the same subject (Betty) performed in three experiments with novel material, which needed to be either bent or unbent in order to function to retrieve food. These tasks exclude the possibility of success by repetition of patterns of movement similar to those employed before. Betty quickly developed novel techniques to bend the material, and appropriately modified it on four of five trials when unbending was required. She did not mechanically apply a previously learned set of movements to the new situations, and instead sought new solutions to each problem. However, the details of her behaviour preclude concluding definitely that she understood and planned her actions: in some cases she probed with the unmodified tools before modifying them, or attempted to use the unmodified (unsuitable) end of the tool after modification. Gauging New Caledonian crows' level of understanding is not yet possible, but the observed behaviour is consistent with a partial understanding of physical tasks at a level that exceeds that previously attained by any other non-human subject, including apes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据