4.5 Article

Particle deposition in spontaneously hypertensive rats exposed via whole-body inhalation: Measured and estimated dose

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 400-410

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl059

关键词

rat; particle; deposition

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES00002] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plethora of epidemiological studies have shown that exposure to elevated levels of ambient particulate matter (PM) can lead to adverse health outcomes, including cardiopulmonary-related mortality. Subsequent animal toxicological studies have attempted to mimic these cardiovascular and respiratory responses, in order to better understand underlying mechanisms. However, it is difficult to quantitate the amount of PM deposited in rodent lungs following inhalation exposure, thus making fundamental dose-to-effect assessment and linkages to human responses problematic. To address this need, spontaneously hypertensive rats were exposed to an oil combustion-derived PM (HP12) via inhalation while being maintained in whole-body plethysmograph chambers. Rats were exposed 6 h/day to 13 mg/m(3) of HP12 for 1 or 4 days. Immediately following the last exposure, rats were sacrificed and their tracheas and lung lobes harvested and separated for neutron activation analysis. Total lower respiratory tract deposition ranged from 20-60 mu g to 89-139 mu g for 1- and 4-day exposures, respectively. Deposition data were compared to default and rat-specific estimates provided by the Multiple Path Particle Deposition (MPPD) model, yielding model predictions that were < 33% of the measured dose. This study suggests that HP12 exposure decreased particle clearance, as the mass of HP12 in the lungs following a 4-day protocol was nearly four times that observed after a 1-day exposure. This work should improve the ability of risk assessors to extrapolate rat-to-human exposure concentrations on the basis of lung burdens and, thus, better relate inhaled doses and resultant toxicological effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据