3.9 Article

Artesunate-induced depletion of embryonic erythroblasts precedes embryolethality and teratogenicity in vivo

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.20092

关键词

artesunate; artemisinin; malaria; embryotoxicity; teratogenicity; enythroblasts; heart; cardiac; malformations; anemia; rat; hypoxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Artesunate (ART), an artemisinin antimalarial, is embryolethal and teratogenic in rats, with the most sensitive days being 10 and 11 postcoitum (pc), respectively (Clark et al.: Birth Defects Res B 71:380-394, 2004; White et al.: Birth Defects Res A 70:265, 2004). METHODS: In this study, pregnant rats were administered a single oral dose of 17 mg/kg ART on Days 10-11 pc and conceptuses were evaluated through Day 14 pc. RESULTS: Paling of visceral yolk sacs was observed within 3-6 hr after treatment. Within 24 hr, marked paling and embryonic erythroblast depletion were observed macroscopically, which preceded malformations and embryo death, and persisted through Day 14 pc. Histologically, embryonic erythroblasts were reduced and cells showed signs of necrosis within 24 hr, were maximally depleted by 48 hr, and had partially rebounded within 34 days after treatment (Days 13 and 14 pc). Iron accumulation was evident in treated erythroblasts as early as 6hr after treatment, suggesting impairment of heme synthesis. Heart abnormalities (swollen or collapsed chambers) were observed within 24hr in similar to 25-60% of embryos and within 48hr in 100% of embryos, correlating with histologic signs of cardiac myopathy (thinned and underdeveloped heart walls and enlarged chambers). Delays in limb and tail development occurred by Day 13 pc. Embryos were viable through Day 13 pc, but similar to 77% of embryos had died by Day 14 pc, presumably due to hypoxia and/or cardiac abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In summary embryonic erythroblasts are the primary target of ART toxicity in the rat embryo after in vivo treatment, preceding embryolethality and malformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据