4.5 Article

Surface crystallization of indomethacin below Tg

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 2350-2355

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-006-9023-4

关键词

amorphous solid; crystallization kinetics; glass transition; indomethacin; physical stability; surface crystallization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To study the surface crystallization of indomethacin (IMC) below T-g and its effects on the kinetics of overall crystallization. Methods. Crystal growth rates in liquid layers formed between microscope cover glasses were measured with the top cover glass in place and removed. Polymorphs were identified by powder X-ray diffraction, Raman microscopy, and melting-point determination by hot-stage microscopy. Surface crystals were identified by scratching the sample surface, by cutting the sample to expose its interior, and by analyzing the intensity of X-ray diffraction. Amorphous IMC particles of different sizes were stored at 40 degrees C (T-g-2 degrees C) and analyzed at different times by differential scanning calorimetry to obtain the kinetics of crystallization. Results. Crystal growth of IMC below T (g) at the free surface was approximately two orders of magnitude faster than that in the bulk, resulting in a surface layer of crystals around a slower-crystallizing interior. Surface crystallization yielded mainly the gamma polymorph. Amorphous IMC powders showed rapid initial crystallization at 40 degrees C, but the crystallization abruptly slowed down at saturation levels below 100%; the larger the particles, the lower the saturation level. Conclusion. The faster surface crystallization of IMC than the bulk crystallization leads to unusual crystallization kinetics wherein a rapid initial increase of crystallinity is followed by an abrupt slowdown of crystallization. Surface crystallization should be distinguished from bulk crystallization in modeling and controlling the crystallization of amorphous solids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据