4.7 Article

Prognostic significance of the Epstein-Barr virus, p53, Bcl-2, and survivin in nasopharyngeal cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 5726-5732

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0571

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a malignant epithelial carcinoma which is intimately associated with EBV The latent presence of EBV affects the function of p53, Bcl-2, and survivin. We thus investigated the relationship between EBV status, p53, Bcl-2, and survivin in biopsy specimens from patients with primary NPC. Experimental Design: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NPC biopsies were evaluated in 80 patients treated with curative radiation from a single institution. The presence of EBV was determined using EBER in situ hybridization, whereas p53, Bcl-2, and survivin were assessed using immunohistochemistry. Results: The majority of NPC specimens in this patient cohort were EBER-positive (64 of 78, or 82%), which in turn, was significantly associated with ethnicity (P = 0.0007), and WHO subtype 2A/2B (P = 0.04). EBER-positive tumors were also associated with p53 (P = 0,002), Bcl-2 (P = 0.04), and nuclear survivin (P = 0.03) expression. Patients with EBER-positive NPC fared better, with a 10-year overall survival of 68% versus 48% for EBER-negative patients (P = 0.03). For nuclear survivin, patients with either low or high nuclear survivin fared worse than patients with intermediate survivin expression (P = 0.05), suggesting that there is an optimal proportion of survivin-expressing cells for best function and clinical outcome. Conclusions: With an extended median follow-up time of 11.4 years, EBV status remains a strong predictor for overall survival in NPC. EBV-positive NPC has strong molecular associations with p53, Bcl-2, and survivin expression. Furthermore, we provide clinical data revealing the potentially dual nature of survivin in predicting clinical outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据