4.6 Article

Structural characterization of mycobacterial phosphatidylinositol mannoside binding to mouse CD1d

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 177, 期 7, 页码 4577-4583

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.7.4577

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 58896] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 62116] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterial phosphatidylinositol tetramannosides (PIM4) are agonists for a distinct population of invariant human (V alpha 24) and mouse (V alpha 14) NKT cells, when presented by CD1d. We determined the crystal structure at 2.6-angstrom resolution of mouse CD1d bound to a synthetic dipalmitoyl-PIM2. Natural PIM2, which differs in its fatty acid composition is a biosynthetic precursor of PIM4, PIM6, lipomannan, and lipoarabinomannan. The PIM2 headgroup (inositol-dimannoside) is the most complex to date among all the crystallized CD1d ligands and is remarkably ordered in the CD1d binding groove. A specific hydrogen-bonding network between PIM2 and CD1d orients the headgroup in the center of the binding groove and above the A' pocket. A central cluster of hydrophilic CD1d residues (Asp(153), Thr(156), Ser(76), Arg(79)) interacts with the phosphate, inositol, and alpha 1-alpha 6-linked mannose of the headgroup, whereas additional specificity for the alpha 1- and alpha 2-linked mannose is conferred by Thr(159). The additional two mannoses in PIM4, relative to PIM2, are located at the distal 6' carbon of the alpha 1-alpha 6-linked mannose and would project away from the CD1d binding groove for interaction with the TCR. Compared with other CD1d-sphingolipid structures, PIM2 has an increased number of polar interactions between its headgroup and CD1, but reduced specificity for the diacylglycerol backbone. Thus, novel NKT cell agonists can be designed that focus on substitutions of the headgroup rather than on reducing lipid chain length, as in OCH and PBS-25, two potent variants of the highly stimulatory invariant NKT cell agonist alpha-galactosylceramide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据