4.6 Article

Trace analysis of fullerenes in biological samples by simplified liquid-liquid extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1129, 期 2, 页码 216-222

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.030

关键词

fullerenes; nanoparticles; colloidal nanoparticles; emulsion; liquid-liquid extraction; solvent evaporation; dermal absorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fullerene (C-60) has several potential biomedical and industrial applications. While pure fullerene is not soluble in water, nanoparticles of the fullerene aggregates (nano-C-60) can be prepared in water solutions. The concentration of nano-C-60 in biological media after systemic exposure could be very low and requires trace analytical methods to be developed for the toxicological and pharmacokinetic studies of the nanomaterial. A serious drop in extraction efficiency was observed when the concentration was under 0.5 mu g/mL using traditional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) protocols. The evaporation of the solvent extract to dryness was found to be the main reason for the efficiency drop and an improved evaporation method was proposed to overcome this problem. Optimal proportion of glacial acetic acid (GAA) was used to solublize the proteins and surfactants in the biological samples, so that the emulsion problem was eliminated during LLE. Magnesium perchlorate was used to destabilize the nano-C-60 particles in the water solution and promoted the solvent extraction. A simplified LLE method was developed for high throughput while preserved the advantages of the traditional LLE. The developed method was used for trace analysis of fullerenes in protein containing media and tape-stripped skin samples. Under optimal experimental conditions, the detection limit was 0.34 ng/mL and the recovery was in the range of 94-100% (n = 5) at a concentration of 10 ng/mL nano-C-60 in the biological media. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据