4.0 Article

Mannose-binding lectin and mortality in type 2 diabetes

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 166, 期 18, 页码 2007-2013

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.18.2007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inflammation and complement activation initiated by mannose-binding lectin (MBL) may be implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. We evaluated the relationship between serum MBL and mortality and development of albuminuria in type 2 diabetes. Methods: Levels of MBL and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at baseline in 326 patients with type 2 diabetes who attended the Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark, for control. Urinary albumin excretion was determined annually, and the vital status of all patients was traced after more than 15 years of follow-up. Results: During follow-up, 169 patients died. The risk of dying was significantly higher among patients with MBL levels greater than or equal to 1000 mu g/L than among patients with levels less than 1000 mu g/L (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.1; P=.005). After adjustment for known confounders, MBL remained a significant risk factor for death from any cause. It added to the predictive power of CRP, and mortality was significantly higher among patients with both high MBL (>= 1000 mu g/L) and high CRP (above the median, 3.6 mg/L) levels than among patients with both low MBL and low CRP levels (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.3; P < .001). Normoalbuminuric patients with both high MBL and high CRP levels at baseline had a significantly increased risk of developing microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria compared with patients with both low MBL and low CRP levels (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.4; P < .001). Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes, measurements of MBL alone or in combination with CRP can provide prognostic information on mortality and the development of albuminuria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据