4.7 Article

Diffuse, nonthermal X-ray emission from the Galactic star cluster Westerlund 1

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 650, 期 1, 页码 203-211

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/507175

关键词

stars : winds, outflows; supernova remnants; X-rays : ISM; X-rays : stars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the diffuse X-ray emission identified in Chandra observations of the young, massive Galactic star cluster Westerlund 1. After removing pointlike X-ray sources down to a completeness limit of approximate to 2 x 10(31) ergs s(-1), we identify ( 3 +/- 1); 1034 ergs s(-1) ( 2-8 keV) of diffuse emission. The spatial distribution of the emission can be described as a slightly elliptical Lorentzian core with a half-width at half-maximum along the major axis of 2500 +/- 100, similar to the distribution of point sources in the cluster, plus a 50 halo of extended emission. The spectrum of the diffuse emission is dominated by a hard continuum component that can be described as a kT greater than or similar to 3 keV thermal plasma that has a low iron abundance ( less than or similar to 0.3 solar) or as nonthermal emission that could be stellar light that is inverse Compton scattered by MeVelectrons. Only 5% of the flux is produced by a kT approximate to 0.7 keV plasma. The low luminosity of the thermal emission and the lack of a 6.7 keV iron line suggest that less than or similar to 40,000 unresolved stars with masses between 0.3 and 2 M-circle dot are present in the cluster, fewer than previously estimated. Moreover, the flux in the diffuse emission is a factor of several lower than would be expected from a supersonically expanding cluster wind, and there is no evidence for thermal remnants produced by supernovae. Less than 10(-5) of the mechanical luminosity of the cluster is dissipated as 2-8 keV X-rays, leaving a large amount of energy that either is radiated at other wavelengths, is dissipated beyond the bounds of our image, or escapes into the intergalactic medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据