4.1 Article

Human sensitivity to PhIP: A novel marker for prostate cancer risk

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.05.023

关键词

prostate cancer; PhIP; peripheral blood lymphocytes; susceptibility

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA84964, CA90270, CA88304, CA98549] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES07784] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) has been implicated in the development of colon, prostate and mammary gland tumors in rats. In this study, we developed a modified in vitro mutagen sensitivity assay, with activated PhIP (N-OH-PhIP) as the challenge mutagen and chromosome aberrations as the endpoint, and applied it in a pilot prostate cancer case-control study of 81 cases and 84 age and ethnicity-matched controls. Our results showed significantly higher baseline breaks among the cases, mean +/- S.E. = 1.86 +/- 0.23 versus 0.96 +/- 0.14 in controls; P = 0.006. Individuals with high baseline breaks (dichotomized at the control median) had a 36% increased risk for PC (OR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.08-1.72). In stratified analysis, high baseline breaks was associated in younger participants (<= 60 years) with an OR of 1.71 (1.14-2.57) and in those with a positive family history of PC, an OR of 1.43 (0.97-2.11). PhIP treatment induced significantly higher breaks in cases, mean +/- S.E. = 5.07 +/- 0.39 versus 3.83 +/- 0.24 in controls; P = 0.05. Higher PhIP-induced breaks was associated with an overall 17% increased risk for PC (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.03-1.33), a significantly increased risks (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.00-1.41) among younger participants, non-smokers (OR = 1.39, 1.03-1.88) and 1.20 (1.00-1.45) among those with no family history of PC. Results from this pilot study demonstrate differential sensitivity to PhIP among subgroups and therefore, this assay have potential as a susceptibility marker for prostate cancer risk. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据