4.5 Article

Induction of Hsp 70 in Vero cells in response to mycotoxins - Cytoprotection by sub-lethal heat shock and by Vitamin E

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 166, 期 2, 页码 122-130

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.06.004

关键词

mycotoxins; Hsp 70 expression; cytoprotection; vitamin E; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analysed the toxicity mechanisms of several mycotoxins using Hsp 70 expression, cytoprotection of Vero cells by sub-lethal beat shock (sub-LHS) and Vitamin E. Our aim was (i) to determine whether Citrinin (CTN), Zearalenone (ZEN) and T2 toxin (T2) could induce the expression of Hsp 70, (ii) to check whether or not elevated levels of Hsp and Vitamin E pre-treatment could provide cytoprotection from these mycotoxins, and finally (iii) to emphasize the eventual involvement of oxidative stress on mycotoxin's toxicity. Our study demonstrated that the three examined mycotoxins induced Hsp 70 expression in a dose-dependent manner. A cytoprotective effect of Hsp 70 was obtained when Vero cells were exposed to sub-lethal heat shock followed by a 12 It recovery prior to mycotoxins treatment and evidenced by a reduction of their cytolethality. This cytoprotection suggested that Hsp 70 might constitute an important cellular defence mechanism. A cytoprotective action was also obtained although at lesser extent, when cells were pre-treated with an antioxidant agent, the Vitamin E before mycotoxins treatment. This Vitamin E cytoprotection evoked the involvement of oxidative stress in mycotoxins induced toxicity, which was further, confirmed by the reduction of Hsp 70 expression when cells were pre-treated with Vitamin E prior to mycotoxins. Our data clearly shows that oxidative stress is certainly involved in the toxicity of the three studied mycotoxins, Citrinin, Zearalenone and T2 toxin and may therefore constitutes a relevant part in their toxicities; however, at variable extent from one mycotoxin to another. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据