4.4 Article

Possible role of climate changes in variations in pollen seasons and allergic sensitizations during 27 years

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 215-222

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2009.12.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Climate changes may affect the quality and amount of airborne allergenic pollens. The direct assessment of such an effect requires long observation periods and a restricted geographic area. Objective: To assess variations in pollens and allergic sensitizations across 27 years in relation to climate change in a specific region. Methods: We recorded pollen counts, season durations, and prevalences of sensitizations for 5 major pollens (birch, cypress, olive, grass, and Parietaria) in western Liguria between 1981 and 2007. Pollen counts were performed using a Hirst-type trap, and sensitizations were assessed by means of skin prick testing. Meteorologic data for the same period included average temperatures, direct radiation, humidity, number of sunny days, and rainfall. Results: There was a progressive increase in the duration of the pollen seasons for Parietaria (+85 days), olive (+18 days), and cypress (+18 days), with an overall advance of their start dates. For Parietaria, there was an advance of 2 months in 2006 vs 1981. Also, the total pollen load progressively increased for the considered species (approximately 25% on average) except for grasses. Percentages of patients sensitized to the pollens increased throughout the years, whereas the percentage of individuals sensitized to house dust mite remained stable. These behaviors paralleled the constant increase in direct radiation, temperature, and number of days with a temperature greater than 30 degrees C. Conclusion: The progressive climate changes, with increased temperatures, may modify the global pollen load and affect the rate of allergic sensitization across long periods. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010; 104:215-222.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据