4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Determination of antimicrobials in sludge from infiltration basins at two artificial recharge plants by pressurized liquid extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1130, 期 1, 页码 72-82

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.076

关键词

sulphonamides; penicillins; antimicrobials; environmental analysis; pressurized liquid extraction; liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; solid-phase extraction; sludge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work describes the optimization of a multi-residue analytical approach for the simultaneous determination of 11 antimicrobials (9 sulphonamides and 2 penicillins) in sludge from infiltration basins. The method is based on pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) for pre-concentration and purification, and analysis by liquid. chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using electrospray in the positive ionization mode (LC-(ESI+)-MS/MS). Limits of detections (LODs) between 1 pg/g and 0.2 ng/g and limits of quantifications (LOQs) between 5 pg/g and 0.6 ng/g were achieved. Good recovery values (57.6-104%) were obtained for sulfamethazine, sulfapyridine, sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxypyridazine, while medium recovery values (14-47%) were afforded for sulfadimethoxine, sulfathiazole and sulfamethoxazole. However, only a poor recovery (< 1%) could be possible for both penicillins and two sulphonamides, namely nafcillin, dicloxacillin, sulfisoxazole and sulfamethizole. These low recoveries were attributed to the presence of ionic suppression effects (even after thorough extraction and purification) rather than to an inefficient extraction. The method developed was applied to the analysis of sludge samples from the infiltration basins of two artificial recharge plants located in Sweden and Denmark. All target compounds were found to be present in at least one sample. Sulfadimethoxine, nafcillin and dicloxacillin were detected in all the samples analysed. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据