4.4 Article

Economic costs associated with acute attacks and long-term management of hereditary angioedema

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 314-U127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.01.024

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dyax Corp.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by recurrent acute attacks of swelling of the larynx, abdomen, and periphery. Objective: To assess the economic burden associated with acute attacks and long-term management of HAE. Methods: Burden was assessed via a Web-based survey of HAE patients (>= 18 years old) that solicited information on attack characterization, short-term treatment, long-term disease management, impact on work, and patient costs. A standardized instrument, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, was included to assess impact on work productivity. Standard medical costs and US average wage costs were assigned to survey items to assess direct medical and indirect costs, respectively. Results: Total annual per-patient costs are estimated at $42,000 for the average HAE patient, with costs totaling $14,000 for patients with mild attacks, $27,000 for patients with moderate attacks, and $96,000 for patients with severe attacks. Hospital costs account for 67% of direct medical costs. Respondents reported high rates of missed work, lost productivity, and lost income, contributing to indirect costs totaling $16,000 annually for the average patient. Almost all costs increase with disease severity, although the distribution varies with severity: indirect costs account for 75% of costs for patients with mild attacks, whereas emergency department and hospital costs account for 68% of costs for patients with severe attacks. Conclusions: HAE results in considerable economic burden to patients, payers, and society in terms of direct medical and indirect costs and compounds the substantial humanistic burdens, which will be reported separately. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104:314-320.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据