4.6 Article

4-hydroxynonenal induces mitochondrial oxidative stress, apoptosis and expression of glutathione S-transferase A4-4 and cytochrorne P450 2E1 in PC12 cells

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 216, 期 2, 页码 309-318

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.06.001

关键词

glutathione; 4-hydroxynonenal; reactive oxygen species; oxidative stress; PC 12 cells; mitochondria and apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An excessive and sustained increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and oxidative stress have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases. In the present study, we have demonstrated that 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), a product of lipid peroxidation, alters glutathione (GSH) pools and induces oxidative stress in PC 12 cells in culture. This increase was accompanied by alterations in subcellular ROS and glutathione (GSH) metabolisms. The GSH homeostasis was affected as both mitochondrial and extramitochondrial GSH levels, GSH peroxidase and glutathione reductase activities were inhibited and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity was increased after 4-HNE treatment. A concentration- and time-dependent increase in cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP 2E1) activity in the mitochondria and postmitochondrial supernatant was also observed. 4-HNE-induced oxidative stress also caused an increase in the expression of GSTA4-4, CYP2E1 and Hsp70 proteins in the mitochondria. Increased oxidative stress in PC 12 cells initiated apoptosis as indicated by the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c, activation of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), DNA fragmentation and decreased expression of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Mitochondrial respiratory and redox functions also appeared to be affected markedly by 4-HNE treatment. These results suggest that HNE-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis might be associated with altered mitochondrial functions and a compromised GSH metabolism and ROS clearance. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据