4.7 Article

A phase I study of in vitro expanded natural killer T cells in patients with advanced and recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 20, 页码 6079-6086

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0114

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Human V alpha 24 natural killer T (V alpha 24 NKT) cells bearing an invariant V alpha 24J alpha Q antigen receptor are activated by a glicolipid ligand a-galactosylceramide (alpha GalCer; KRN7000) in a CD1d-dependent manner. The human V alpha 24 NKTcells activated with alpha GalCer and interleukin-2 have been shown to produce large amounts of cytokines, such as IFN-gamma, and also exerting a potent killing activity against various tumor cell lines. We did a phase I study with autologous activated V alpha 24 NKT cell therapy. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer received i.v. injections of activated V alpha 24 NKTcells (level 1: 1 x 10(7)/m(2) and level 2: 5 x 107/m(2)) to test the safety, feasibility, and clinical response of this therapeutic strategy. Immunomonitoring was also done in all cases. Results: Six patients were enrolled in this study. No severe adverse events were observed during this study in any patients. After the first and second injection of activated V alpha 24 NKTcells, an increased number of peripheral blood V alpha 24 NKTcells was observed in two of three cases receiving a level 2 dose of activated V alpha 24 NKTcells. The number of IFN-gamma-producing cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased after the administration of activated V alpha 24 NKT cells in all three cases receiving the level 2 dose. No patient was found to meet the criteria for either a partial or a complete response. Conclusions: The clinical trial with activated V alpha 24 NKT cell administration was well tolerated and carried out safely with minor adverse events even in patients with advanced diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据