4.7 Article

Apocynin normalizes hyperreactivity to phenylephrine in mesenteric arteries from cholesterol-fed mice by improving endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor response

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 1289-1303

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.07.012

关键词

apocynin; contraction; EDHF; hypercholesterolemia; mesentery; mice; oxidative stress; free radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the relationship among endothelial function, oxidative stress, and phenylephrine (PE; alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist)-induced contraction in mesenteric arteries from high-cholesterol (HQ-diet-fed mice. In HC mice (vs age-matched normal-diet-fed mice): (1) PE-induced contraction in endothelium-intact rings was enhanced (endothelial denudation increased contraction in normal-diet rings, but did not enhance it further in HC rings); (2) the enhanced PE-induced contraction was further enhanced in the presence of N-G-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA; nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) or L-NNA plus indomethacin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor) [to preserve endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF)], but unchanged in the presence of charybdotoxin plus apamin (to block EDHF); (3) ACh-induced EDHF-type relaxation was reduced; and (4) oxidative stress [indicated by the plasma 8-isoprostane level (reliable systemic marker) and aortic superoxide production] was greater. In HC mice, PE-induced contraction was normalized by apocynin [NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitor] or tempol (superoxide dismutase mimetic), but enhanced by NADH [NAD(P)H oxidase substrate]. Oral dietary supplementation with apocynin (30 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks) corrected the above abnormalities. Hence: (1) PE-induced contraction is modulated by the endothelium, and the enhanced contractility in HC mice results from defective EDHF signaling and elevated oxidative stress, and (2) apocynin normalizes PE-induced contraction in HC mice by improving EDHF signaling. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据