4.5 Article

Recruitment of the SWI/SNF protein Brg1 by a multiprotein complex effects transcriptional repression in murine erythroid progenitors

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 399, 期 -, 页码 297-304

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20060873

关键词

Brahma-related gene 1 (Brg1); co-repressor erythroid; progenitor; histone deacetylase; SWI/SNF; transcriptional repression

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL049118-13, R01 HL49118, R01 HL049118] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SWI/SNF complexes are involved in both activation and repression of transcription. While one of two homologous ATPases, Brg 1 [Brm (Brahma)-related gene 1] or Brm, is required for their chromatin remodelling function, less is known about how these complexes are recruited to DNA. We recently established that a DNA-binding complex containing TAL1/SCL, E47, GATA-1, LMO2 and Ldb1 stimulates P4.2 (protein 4.2) transcription in erythroid progenitors via two E box-GATA elements in the gene's proximal promoter. We show here that the SWI/SNF protein Brg 1 is also associated with this complex and that both the E box and GATA DNA-binding sites in these elements are required for Brg 1 recruitment. Further, Brg 1 occupancy of the P4.2 promoter decreased with terminal erythroid differentiation in association with increased P4.2 transcription, while enforced expression of Brg 1 in murine erythroleukaemia cells reduced P4.2 gene expression. Overexpression of Brg 1 was associated with increased occupancy of the P4.2 promoter by the nuclear co-repressor mSin3A and HDAC2 (histone deacetylase 2) and with reduced histone H3 and H4 acetylation. Finally, a specific HDAC inhibitor attenuated Brg 1-directed repression of P4.2 promoter activity in transfected cells. These results provide insight into the mechanism by which,SWI/SNF proteins are recruited to promoters and suggest that transcription of P4.2, and most likely other genes, is actively repressed until the terminal differentiation of erythroid progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据