4.7 Article

The magnesium isotope budget of the modem ocean: Constraints from riverine magnesium isotope ratios

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 250, 期 1-2, 页码 241-253

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.07.037

关键词

magnesium; Mg; flux; isotopes; weathering; oceans; cycle; rivers; palaeo-oceanography

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C510583/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have measured the magnesium (Mg) isotope ratios in 45 rivers including 16 of the largest rivers in the world, covering a range of geologic, tectonic and climatic drainage basin environments. The range in riverine delta Mg-26 is 2.5 parts per thousand, half the variation in terrestrial rock. Although the Mg isotopic composition of the source rock is important for small rivers, at a global scale lithology is of limited significance for Mg isotope ratios in rivers. Part of the variability at a global scale may be attributed to fractionation in the weathering environment. The rivers analysed constitute 30% of the global Mg riverine flux to the oceans and a flux weighted Mg isotope composition of global runoff has been estimated at - 1.09 parts per thousand. Even taking into account uncertainty, this is distinct from seawater at -0.82 parts per thousand.. This difference arises either from the fractionation of Mg isotope ratios in the ocean and/or a Mg budget which is not at steady state. The difference is consistent with fractionation by carbonate precipitation. In the simplest steady state scenario, where the oceanic mass balance is maintained by riverine input and hydrothermal and dolomite output, Mg isotope ratios imply a minimum dolomite Mg flux of 9% of the total output Mg flux. The implications of the distinct isotopic composition of the riverine flux from modem seawater, is that the Mg isotope ratio of seawater has probably varied outside of current analytical uncertainty. Mg isotope ratios may therefore provide a valuable new tracer in palaeo-oceanography. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据