4.5 Article

Relative expression of D3 dopamine receptor and alternative splice variant D3nf rnRNA in high and low responders to novelty

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 70, 期 4-6, 页码 296-303

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.06.010

关键词

dopamine receptor; drug dependence; RT-PCR; mRNA; locomotor activity; alternative splicing

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA016778] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies in rodents suggest an important role for the D3 dopamine receptor in regulating locomotor responses to spatial novelty and psychostimulants. The D3 receptor alternatively spliced variant D3nf produces a non-dopamine binding protein that may alter D3 receptor localization by dimerizing with the full-length receptor. In the high responder/low responder (HR/LR) model, the locomotor response to an inescapable, novel spatial environment predicts individual differences in the locomotor and rewarding effects of psychostimulants. We hypothesized that individual differences in D3 receptor expression could contribute to individual differences in the locomotor response to novelty in the HR/LR model. To test this hypothesis, we screened rats for response to a novel spatial environment and analyzed brain tissue for mRNA levels of the D3 receptor and D3nf by real-time RT-PCR. The ratios of D3/D3nf mRNA in prefrontal cortex and substantia nigra/ventral tegmentum were significantly lower in HRs than in LRs. There were no differences in relative expression of D3/D3nf between HRs and LRs in nucleus accumbens. These data further support a role for the D3 dopamine receptor in behavioral responses to novelty and, given the established relationship between novelty and psychostimulant responses, suggest that the D3 receptor may be an important target for assessment of drug abuse vulnerability. Additionally, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that alternative splicing may contribute to regulation of D3 dopamine receptor function. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据