4.5 Article

Fenton chemistry and iron chelation under physiologically relevant conditions: Electrochemistry and kinetics

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 1263-1269

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx060101w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of iron-chelation therapy is to reduce the levels of labile plasma iron, and intravenously administered desferrioxamine is the gold standard of therapeutic agents. Hydroxypyridinones, e. g., CP20 (3-hydroxy-1,2-dimethylpyridin-4(1H)-one), are used or are under investigation as orally administered iron chelators. We determined electrode potentials of CP20, the related hydoxypyridones CP361, CP363, and CP502, and ICL670 (4-[3,5-bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl] benzoic acid) under physiologically relevant conditions to address the question of whether iron in the presence of these chelating agents can carry out Fenton chemistry in vivo. We found that iron(III) but not iron(II) binds tightly to both CP20 and ICL670 at pH 7 and higher, compared to nearly complete binding of 1 mu M iron(II) to 10 mu M desferrioxamine at pH 7.4 The electrode potentials of the hydroxypyridinones shift to more negative values with decreasing pK(a) values at lower concentrations of iron(III) (0.02 mM) and ligand (0.1 mM). The electrode potential of the iron-CP20 system decreases as a function of increasing pH, with a minimum near pH 10.5. We estimate an electrode potential for the ascorbyl radical/ascorbate couple under physiological conditions of +105 mV, which is higher than the electrode potential of the iron(III) complex of CP20 at all concentrations of iron. The rate of oxidation of iron(II) in the presence of CP20 by hydrogen peroxide increases with the concentrations of both ligand and peroxide. Although iron( II) is oxidized by hydrogen peroxide, the thus-formed Fe-III(CP20)(3) complex cannot be reduced by ascorbate. Therefore, the tight binding of iron(III) by this class of chelators prevents redox cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据