4.7 Article

Inhibition of pro-inflammatory markers in primary bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages by naturally occurring flavonoids:: Analysis of the structure-activity relationship

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 1010-1021

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.07.016

关键词

flavonoids; inflammation; macrophages; structure-activity analysis; iNOS; TNF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flavonoids possess several biological/pharmacological activities including anticancer, antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antioxidant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of flavonoids on macrophage physiology. For this purpose we selected some flavonoids belonging to the most common and abundant groups (flavonols-quercetin and kaempferol; flavones-diosmetin, apigenin, chrysin and luteolin; isoflavones-genistein and daidzein and flavanones-hesperetin). We decided to use primary bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) as cellular model, since they represent a homogenous, non-transformed population of macrophages that can be stimulated in vitro to proliferate by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) or activated by LPS. In this regard, we demonstrated that most of the flavonoids assayed reduce macrophage M-CSF-induced proliferation without affecting cellular viability. Moreover, some flavonoids also inhibit TNF alpha production as well as NOS expression and NO production in LPS-activated macrophages, an effect that has been associated with the inhibition of the NF-kappa B pathway. We also found that luteolin and quercetin are able to stimulate the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 at low concentrations (< 50 mu M). Analysis of the structure-activity relationship showed that four hydroxylations at positions 5, 7, 3' and 4', together with the double bond at C-2-C-3 and the position of the B ring at 2, seem to be necessary for the highest anti-inflammatory effect. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据