4.8 Article

Mapping protein dynamics in catalytic intermediates of the redox-driven proton pump cytochrome coxidase

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601451103

关键词

conformational change; mass spectrometry; hydrogen/deuterium exchange

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32 ES07028, F32 ES013105-01, F32 ES013105, P30 ES000267, F32 ES013105-02, P30 ES00267, T32 ES007028] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM030910, R01 GM30910] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Redox-driven proton pumps such as cytochrome c oxiclase (CcO) are fundamental elements of the energy transduction machinery in biological systems. CcO is an integral membrane protein that acts as the terminal electron acceptor in respiratory chains of aerobic organisms, catalyzing the four-electron reduction Of O-2 to H2O This reduction also requires four protons taken from the cytosolic or negative side of the membrane, with an additional uptake of four protons that are pumped across the membrane. Therefore, the proton pump must embody a gate, which provides alternating access of protons to one or the other side of the membrane but never both sides simultaneously. However, the exact mechanism of proton translocation through CcO remains unknown at the molecular level. Understanding pump function requires knowledge of the nature and location of these structural changes that is often difficult to access with crystallography or NMR spectroscopy. In this paper, we demonstrate, with amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange MS, that transitions between catalytic intermediates in CcO are orchestrated with opening and closing of specific proton pathways, providing an alternating access for protons to the two sides of the membrane. An analysis of these results in the framework of the 3D structure of CcO indicate the spatial location of a gate, which controls the unidirectional proton flux through the enzyme and points to a mechanism by which CcO energetically couples electron transfer to proton translocation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据