4.7 Article

Role of bone morphogenic protein 2 in retinal patterning and retinotectal projection

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 26, 期 42, 页码 10868-10878

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3027-06.2006

关键词

retina; retinotectal projection; BMP2; ventroptin; ephrin-A2; chick

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been long believed that the anteroposterior (A-P) and dorsoventral (D-V) axes in the developing retina are determined independently and also that the retinotectal projection along the two axes is controlled independently. However, we recently demonstrated that misexpression of Ventroptin, a bone morphogenic protein (BMP) antagonist, in the developing chick retina alters the retinotectal projection not only along the D-V (or mediolateral) axis but also along the A-P axis. Moreover, the dorsal-high expression of BMP4 is relieved by the dorsotemporal-high expression of BMP2 at embryonic day 5 (E5) in the retina, during which Ventroptin continuously counteracts the two BMPs keeping on the countergradient expression pattern, respectively. Here, we show that the topographic molecules so far reported to have a gradient only along the D-V axis and ephrin-A2 so far only along the A-P axis are both controlled by the BMP signal, and that they are expressed in a gradient manner along the tilted axis from E6 on in the developing chick retina: the expression patterns of these oblique-gradient molecules are all changed, when BMP2 expression is manipulated in the developing retina. Furthermore, in both BMP2 knockdown embryos and ephrin-A2-misexpressed embryos, the retinotectal projection is altered along the two orthogonal axes. The expressional switching from BMP4 to BMP2 thus appears to play a key role in the retinal patterning and topographic retinotectal projection by tilting the D-V axis toward the posterior side during retinal development. Our results also indicate that BMP2 expression is essential for the maintenance of regional specificity along the revised D-V axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据