4.4 Article

Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review, VIII: current status of emerging therapies

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 S41-S46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60585-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To provide an overview on the current status of emerging therapies for hereditary angioedema (HAE) in the United States. Data Sources: Summary statements were obtained from each pharmaceutical company regarding their agent. Study Selection: Each agent is undergoing or has completed phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Results: Berinert P, a purified, virus-inactivated, human plasma-derived Cl inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate, is being investigated in 2 international, multicenter, prospective trials. Experience with this agent in Europe and Canada indicates it is effective and safe. Cinryze is a nanofiltered C1-INH replacement therapy demonstrated to be effective and safe in acute and prophylactic arms of a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Rhucin, a recombinant human C1-INH replacement therapy from transgenic rabbits, has been shown to be effective and safe in phase 2 and phase 2/3 studies, with an additional phase 3 study ongoing. DX-88 or ecallantide, a potent and specific inhibitor of plasma kallikrein, achieved all primary and secondary efficacy end points in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study, with a second phase 3 study ongoing. Icatibant, a potent and specific peptidomimetic bradykinin 2 receptor antagonist, was studied in 2 phase 3 trials: FAST I (For Angioedema Subcutaneous Treatment) did not achieve statistical significance for the primary end point but did so for secondary end points, whereas FAST 2 achieved statistical significance for primary and secondary end points. Conclusions: The future treatment of HAE in the United States appears promising based on progress being made in drug development for this orphan disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据