4.7 Article

Hydrotalcites composition as catalysts:: Preparation and their behavior on epoxidation of two bicycloalkenes

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 95, 期 1-3, 页码 39-47

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.05.004

关键词

Mg/Al-Mo, Ni/Al-Mo and Zn/Al-Mo hydrotalcites; polyoxometalates; epoxidation; norbornadiene; benzonorbornadiene; cyclohexene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrotalcites containing heptamolybdate (Mo7O246-) in the interlayer and Al combined with different divalent cations (Mg, Zn, Ni) in the brucite-like layers were prepared by ion exchange from suitable precursors containing terephthalate. To prepare these materials, a given amount of terephthalic acid was adjusted at pH 8.0 with NaOH and then mixed with a second solution, containing amounts of M(NO3)(2)center dot 6H(2)O (M = Mg, Zn, Ni) and Al(NO3)(3)center dot 9H(2)O corresponding to a M2+/M3+ molar ratio of 2, keeping the molar Al:terephthalate ratio to a value of 2:1. After refluxing under inert atmosphere and drying in vacuum, hydrotalcites were exchanged with aqueous solutions of ammonium heptamolybdate for an Al/Mo molar ratio of 4: 1. Characterization of these solids was made using element chemical analysis, adsorption-desorption isotherms of nitrogen at -196 degrees C, powder X-ray diffraction, and FT-IR spectroscopy. The catalysts were tested in liquid phase oxidation of bicyclo[2.2.1]-2,5-heptadiene (norbornadiene); benzobicyclo[2.2.1]-2-heptene (benzonorbornadiene) and cyclohexene using hydrogen peroxide and dioxane or dioxane-butyl maleate mixture as solvents. The selectivity to epoxides was found to depend on the hydrotalcite composition and on the reaction solvent. Hydrotalcites containing Ni/Al-Mo and Zn/Al-Mo were more selective than the Mg/Al-Mo one. The replacement of dioxane with a dioxane-butyl maleate mixture led to a decrease in the selectivity to epoxide. Recycling of the catalysts over six successive runs demonstrated their stability. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据