4.6 Article

The tail domain of myosin Va modulates actin binding to one head

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 42, 页码 31326-31336

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M603898200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [1F31AR051614-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK25387] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM073823] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium activates full-length myosin Va steady-state enzymatic activity and favors the transition from a compact, folded off state to an extended on state. However, little is known of how a head-tail interaction alters the individual actin and nucleotide binding rate and equilibrium constants of the ATPase cycle. We measured the effect of calcium on nucleotide and actin filament binding to full-length myosin Va purified from chick brains. Both heads of nucleotide-free myosin Va bind actin strongly, independent of calcium. In the absence of calcium, bound ADP weakens the affinity of one head for actin filaments at equilibrium and upon initial encounter. The addition of calcium allows both heads of myosin Va(.)ADP to bind actin strongly. Calcium accelerates ADP binding to actomyosin independent of the tail but minimally affects ATP binding. Although O-18 exchange and product release measurements favor a mechanism in which actin-activated P-i release from myosin Va is very rapid, independent of calcium and the tail domain, both heads do not bind actin strongly during steady-state cycling, as assayed by pyrene actin fluorescence. In the absence of calcium, inclusion of ADP favors formation of a long lived myosin Va(.)ADP state that releases ADP slowly, even after mixing with actin. Our results suggest that calcium activates myosin Va by allowing both heads to interact with actin and exchange bound nucleotide and indicate that regulation of actin binding by the tail is a nucleotide-dependent process favored by linked conformational changes of the motor domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据