4.4 Article

Hereditary angioedema: a current state-of-the-art review. III: mechanisms of hereditary angioedema

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 S7-S12

出版社

AMER COLL ALLERGY ASTHMA IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60580-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI057366] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD22082] Funding Source: Medline
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD022082, R37HD022082] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI057366] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To review the available evidence on the pathophysiologic mechanism of episodes of edema in hereditary angioedema (HAE). Data Sources: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched using the following keywords: hereditary angioedema, C1 inhibitor, complement system, contact system, and bradykinin. Study Selection: Studies were selected based on their relevance to the pathophysiologic features of HAE. Results: Early studies from the 1970s and 1980s disagreed as to whether the symptoms in HAE were mediated via complement or contact system activation. Studies have demonstrated that, in vitro, in C1 inhibitor (C1-INH)-deficient plasma, only contact system activation results in generation of a vascular permeability enhancing factor. Furthermore, individuals who express a variant C1-INH that is a normal inhibitor of contact system proteases but is deficient in the ability to inactivate complement system proteases do not develop angioedema. The blood of patients with HAE, during attacks, contains elevated levels of cleaved high-molecular-weight kininogen and bradykinin. Last, C1-INH-deficient mice develop increased vascular permeability that is mediated via contact system activation. Conclusions: Hereditary angioedema attacks are mediated by bradykinin generated via contact system activation. The specific factors that trigger attacks remain unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据