4.8 Article

Corneal avascularity is due to soluble VEGF receptor-1

期刊

NATURE
卷 443, 期 7114, 页码 993-997

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature05249

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [074127] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corneal avascularity - the absence of blood vessels in the cornea is required for optical clarity and optimal vision, and has led to the cornea being widely used for validating pro- and anti-angiogenic therapeutic strategies for many disorders(1-4). But the molecular underpinnings of the avascular phenotype have until now remained obscure(5-10) and are all the more remarkable given the presence in the cornea of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, a potent stimulator of angiogenesis, and the proximity of the cornea to vascularized tissues. Here we show that the cornea expresses soluble VEGF receptor-1 (sVEGFR-1; also known as sflt-1) and that suppression of this endogenous VEGF-A trap(11) by neutralizing antibodies, RNA interference or Cre-lox-mediated gene disruption abolishes corneal avascularity in mice. The spontaneously vascularized corneas of corn1 and Pax6(+/-) mice(12,13) and Pax6(+/-) patients with aniridia(14) are deficient in sflt-1, and recombinant sflt-1 administration restores corneal avascularity in corn1 and Pax6(+/-) mice. Manatees, the only known creatures uniformly to have vascularized corneas(15), do not express sflt-1, whereas the avascular corneas of dugongs, also members of the order Sirenia, elephants, the closest extant terrestrial phylogenetic relatives of manatees, and other marine mammals ( dolphins and whales) contain sflt-1, indicating that it has a crucial, evolutionarily conserved role. The recognition that sflt-1 is essential for preserving the avascular ambit of the cornea can rationally guide its use as a platform for angiogenic modulators, supports its use in treating neovascular diseases, and might provide insight into the immunological privilege of the cornea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据