4.6 Article

Signaling pathway of insulin-like growth factor-II as a target of molecular therapy for hepatoblastoma

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 12, 期 40, 页码 6531-6535

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i40.6531

关键词

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-; (4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium inner salt assay; phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase; mitogen-activated protein kinase; hepatoblastoma; molecular therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To address the possibility that insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II is a growth factor and its signaling pathway so as to develop a molecular therapy for hepatoblastoma. METHODS: Huh-6 and HepG2, human hepatoblastoma cell lines, were used. IGF-II was added to the medium deprived of serum. Western blot analysis was performed to clarify the expression of IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR). Inhibitors of IGF-IR (piclopodophyllin, PPP), phosphatidyl-inositol (PI) 3-kinase (LY294002 and Wortmannin), or mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (PD98059) were added to unveil the signaling pathway of IGF-II. Cells were analyzed morphologically with hematoxylin-eosin staining to reveal the mechanism of suppression of cell proliferation. RESULTS: IGF-II stimulated cells proliferated to 2.7 (269% +/- 76%) (mean +/- SD) (Huh-6) and 2.1 (211% +/- 85%) times (HepG2). IGF-IR was expressed in Huh-6 and HepG2. PPP suppressed the cell number to 44% +/- 11% (Huh-6) and 39% 5% (HepG2). LY294002 and Wortmannin suppressed the cell number to 30% +/- 5% (Huh-6), 44% +/- 0.4% (HepG2), 49% +/- 1.0% (Huh-6) and 46% +/- 1.1% (HepG2), respectively. PD98059 suppressed the cell number to 33% +/- 11% for HepG2 but not for Huh-6. When cell proliferation was prohibited, many Huh-6 and HepG2 cells were dead with pyknotic or fragmented nuclei, suggesting apoptosis. CONCLUSION: IGF-II was shown to be a growth factor of hepatoblastoma via IGF-I receptor and PI3 kinase which were good candidates for target of molecular therapy. (C) 2006 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据