4.7 Article

Folding kinetics of a lattice protein via a forward flux sampling approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 125, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2357944

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We implement a forward flux sampling approach [R. J. Allen , J. Chem. Phys. 124, 194111 (2006)] for calculating transition rate constants and for sampling paths of protein folding events. The algorithm generates trajectories for the transition between the unfolded and folded states as chains of partially connected paths, which can be used to obtain the transition-state ensemble and the properties that characterize these intermediates. We apply this approach to Monte Carlo simulations of a model lattice protein in open space and in confined spaces of varying dimensions. We study the effect of confinement on both protein thermodynamic stability and folding kinetics; the former by mapping free-energy landscapes and the latter by the determination of rate constants and mechanistic details of the folding pathway. Our results show that, for the range of temperatures where the native state is stable, confinement of a protein destabilizes the unfolded state by reducing its entropy, resulting in increased thermodynamic stability of the folded state. Relative to the folding in open space, we find that the kinetics can be accelerated at temperatures above the temperature at which the unconfined protein folds fastest and that the rate constant increases with the number of constrained dimensions. By examining the statistical properties of the transition-state ensemble, we detect signs of a classical nucleation folding mechanism for a core of native contacts formed at an early stage of the process. This nucleus acts as folding foci and is composed of those residues that have higher probability to form native contacts in the transition-state intermediates, which can vary depending on the confinement conditions of the system. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据