4.4 Article

Application of arsenazo III in the preparation and characterization of an albumin-linked, gadolinium-based macromolecular magnetic resonance contrast agent

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 157, 期 2, 页码 238-245

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.05.013

关键词

brain tumor; gadomer-17; Gd-DTPA; MRI

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL70023] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A macromolecular magnetic resonance contrast agent (MMCA) was prepared by linking bovine serum albumin (BSA) to gadolinium (Gd) via a chelating agent, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). Colorimetric testing with 2,7-bis(o-arsenophenylazo)-1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene-3,6-disulfonic acid (arsenazo III) was performed to check for the appearance of free gadolinium during preparation and to quantify the Gd content in the final product. The complex was purified by dialysis, concentrated by lyophilyzation and characterized by magnetic resonance (MR) proton relaxation times. The resultant product had a molecular weight of about 90 kDa, Gd:BSA ratio of 14:1, and T-1 and T-2 relaxation times of 128.3 and 48.9 ms, respectively, at a field strength of 7 Tesla (T) and at 20% concentration. Contrast enhancement of Gadomer-17 (a dendritic MMCA) and Gd-linked to BSA (Gd-BSA) was sequentially evaluated in a rat brain gliosarcoma model (n = 5) by MR imaging (MRI). Following intravenous injection, the blood concentration of Gadomer-17 fell rapidly, whereas that of Gd-BSA was almost constant for the duration of imaging. The areas of enhancement of both MMCAs were comparable. The spatial distribution of Gd-BSA showed good agreement with Evans blue-tagged albumin. Treatment with dexamethasone decreased Gd-BSA enhancement in the tumor. These results suggest that the arsenazo III method is applicable in preparing Gd-BSA to image brain tumors and their response to treatment. This simple method may also be useful for preparing other gadolinium-linked MMCAs. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据