4.7 Article

Establishing fine-grained sediment budgets for the Pang and Lambourn LOCAR catchments, UK

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 330, 期 1-2, 页码 126-141

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.015

关键词

(CS)-C-137 measurements; soil erosion; sediment budgets; sediment sources; sediment storage; channel storage; suspended sediment yield; sediment delivery ratio

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/T/S/2001/00936, ceh010022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An integrated approach to data collection combining the use of Cs-137 measurements, sediment source fingerprinting, bed sediment surveys and conventional river monitoring, has been successfully employed to establish the fine-grained sediment budgets of two Lowland groundwater-fed catchments in the UK. Gross surface erosion is higher on cultivated land (Pang: 55263 t yr(-1) or 507 t km(-2) yr(-1); Lambourn: 79997 t yr(-1) or 437 t km(-2) yr(-1)) than on pasture (Pang: 1960 t yr(-1) or 140 t km(-2) yr(-1); Lambourn: 1425 t yr(-1) or 95 t km(-2) yr(-1)) in both study areas and a substantial proportion of the mobilized sediment is sequestered within the fields (Pang: 28 058 t yr(-1) or 228 t km(-2) yr(-1); Lambourn: 55 575 t yr(-1) or 281 t km(-2) yr(-1)) and between the individual fields and the river channel network (Pang: 28 672 t yr(-1) or 233 t km(-2) yr(-1); Lambourn: 24782 t yr(-1) or 125 t km(-2) yr(-1)). The sediment contribution from banks and subsurface sources is relatively low and typically ca. 5 t yr(-1) in the Pang and ca. 11 t yr(-1) in the Lambourn, representing only about 1% of the suspended sediment output from each study catchment. The mean level of fine-grained sediment storage in the main channel system is equivalent to 38% (Pang) and 21% (Lambourn) of the respective mean annual suspended sediment yields of the two catchments. The estimated sediment delivery ratio for both study catchments is ca. 1%. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据