4.7 Article

Preclinical evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of melatonin in propylene glycol for intravenous administration

期刊

JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 337-343

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2006.00372.x

关键词

biochemistry; hematology; histology; melatonin; pharmacokinetics; rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melatonin is a highly effective treatment in different animal models of excitotoxicity or ischemia/reperfusion injury. Due to a lack of patentability, commercial sponsors are not interested in funding clinical evaluations of melatonin. Investigators may initiate small-scale clinical evaluation, and intravenous (i.v.) administration is appropriate in acute stroke patients. Institutional Review Boards may require proper preclinical evaluation of the preparation. In this pharmacokinetic and safety study, melatonin in propylene glycol was evaluated in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Following a single i.v. injection at 5 or 15 mg/kg, plasma concentrations of melatonin increased to 39 and 199 million pg/mL at 2 min and 128 000 and 772 000 pg/mL at 120 min. Within 60 min of injection, the blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature remained unaffected. Melatonin at 5 mg/kg did not influence the complete blood counts at 60 min, but melatonin at 15 mg/kg had some effects on the differential white cell and platelet counts. Melatonin at 5 or 15 mg/kg slightly elevated some liver enzymes at 60 min of injection, and melatonin at higher dose also elevated plasma creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase levels. At 24 hr after completion of six daily injections of melatonin, there was a 5.5% reduction in body weight. Gross postmortem examination and histological examination of the brain, kidney, liver and spleen did not reveal any evidence of toxicity. In conclusion, melatonin in propylene glycol markedly elevates plasma levels of melatonin with no serious toxicity. This preparation should be further evaluated in human patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据