4.2 Article

Screening or diagnostic: Markedly elevated glucose loading test and perinatal outcomes

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767050600926546

关键词

elevated glucose loading test; perinatal outcomes

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD01262] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of markedly elevated 50-g glucose loading test results (>= 200 mg/dL) and associated perinatal outcomes. Method. This was a retrospective cohort study of 14 771 pregnancies screened for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) between 1988 and 2001. The positive predictive value of the 50-g oral glucose loading test (GLT) results as measured by plasma glucose value was examined. Perinatal outcomes were assessed for women with GLT results >= 200 mg/dL compared to GLT < 200 mg/dL, stratified by the diagnosis of GDM. Statistical comparisons were made using the Chi-square test and Student's t-test and potential confounding factors were controlled for using multivariable logistic regression analyses. A p value < 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals were used to indicate statistical significance. Results. The positive predictive values for a GDM diagnosis were 62% for GLT results between 180 and 189 mg/dL, 79% for those between 200 and 209 mg/dL, and 100% for GLT results >= 230 mg/dL. Compared to women with a GLT result < 200 mg/dL, among women not diagnosed with GDM but with a GLT >= 200 mg/dL the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for cesarean delivery was 4.18 (95% confidence intervals, 1.15-15.2). These women also had higher aORs for preterm delivery < 32 weeks (aOR = 8.05 (1.02-63.6)), shoulder dystocia (aOR=15.14 (1.64-140)), and their neonates were more likely to have a 5-minute Apgar score < 7 (aOR = 6.41 (1.23-33.3)). For women diagnosed with GDM and with a GLT >= 200 mg/dL, the aOR for cesarean delivery was also elevated compared to those with a GLT < 200 mg/dL (aOR = 2.24 (1.19-4.21)). Conclusion. A GLT value of >= 200 mg/dL is not absolutely diagnostic for gestational diabetes but is associated with unfavorable perinatal outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据