4.6 Article

Validity of age at menarche self-reported in adulthood

期刊

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
卷 60, 期 11, 页码 993-997

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.043182

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U120063239] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U120063239] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U120063239] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To test the validity of age at menarche self-reported in adulthood and examine whether socioeconomic position, education, experience of gynaecological events and psychological symptoms influence the accuracy of recall. Design: Prospective birth cohort study. Setting: England, Scotland and Wales. Participants: 1050 women from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, with two measures of age at menarche, one recorded in adolescence and the other self-reported at age 48 years. Results: By calculating the limits of agreement, kappa statistic and Pearson's correlation coefficients (r), we found that the validity of age at menarche self-reported in middle age compared with that recorded in adolescence was moderate (kappa = 0.35, r = 0.66, n = 1050). Validity was improved by categorising age at menarche into three groups: early, normal and late (kappa = 0.43). Agreement was influenced by educational level and having had a stillbirth or miscarriage. Conclusions: The level of validity shown in this study throws some doubt on whether it is justifiable to use age at menarche self-reported in middle age. It is likely to introduce error and bias, and researchers should be aware of these limitations and use such measures with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据