4.6 Article

The monotonic dependency of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex on the intensity of the startle-eliciting stimulus

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 174, 期 1, 页码 143-150

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.016

关键词

prepulse inhibition; intensity; sensorimotor gating; startle; human

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex is a translational behavioural paradigm for the assessment of sensorimotor gating deficit which has been demonstrated in a number of neuropsychiatric conditions. PPI refers to the reduction of the reflexive startle response to a 'pulse' stimulus when its presentation is shortly preceded by a weak 'prepulse' stimulus. We have recently examined the expression of PPI as a function of the startle-eliciting 'pulse' stimulus intensity in mice and in humans. One major discrepancy that emerged was the finding that healthy human subjects, unlike normal mice, did not show a clear monotonic reduction of PPI magnitude (as indexed by % reduction in startle reactivity) with increasingly intense pulse stimulus. This lack of correspondence between species may potentially weaken the translational power of the PPI paradigm. Here, we re-examined this issue in 31 healthy subjects across three levels of pulse stimulus intensity (95, 105 and 115 dB). A clear linear reduction of PPI as a function of pulse intensity was revealed when subjects failing to respond to the lowest pulse stimulus were excluded. Inclusion of such non-responders, on the other hand, resulted in a trend towards an inverted U-shape function as reported previously. The present study thus clarifies an apparent divergence between mouse and man, and provides important qualification to the First Law of Reflex Modification proposed by Hoffman and Ison which suggests that the absolute reduction in startle reactivity resulting from a prepulse stimulus preceding the startle-eliciting pulse stimulus is fixed by the prepulse intensity regardless of the pulse stimulus intensity. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据