4.6 Article

During acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection highly susceptible mice deficient in natural killer cells are protected by a single α-galactosylceramide treatment

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 355-361

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02439.x

关键词

cellular activation; natural killer cells; natural killer T cells; parasite; protozoan; T lymphocytes

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI049455, AI49455] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protective immune response against Trypanosoma cruzi is improved by treatment with the natural killer (NK) T-cell glycolipid antigen alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer). A single alpha-GalCer treatment of mice before T. cruzi infection decreases parasitaemia and prolongs survival. This protection is dependent on CD1d-restricted NKT cells and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) suggesting that alpha-GalCer-activated NKT cells produce IFN-gamma, which stimulates the cells of the innate and adaptive immune responses to provide protection. To learn which cells provide protection we investigate here alpha-GalCer treatment of mice deficient in different immune cells. Surprisingly, although NK cells provide protection against T. cruzi, and are a major source of IFN-gamma following alpha-GalCer treatment, NK cells are not required for the alpha-GalCer-induced protection. The alpha-GalCer treatment of NK-cell-depleted mice controlled parasitaemia and prevented death. In contrast, phagocytes, helper T cells and cytotoxic T cells are required. Furthermore, alpha-GalCer treatment of MHC II-/- or CD8 alpha(-/-) mice exacerbated the infection, demonstrating that alpha-GalCer treatment induces some responses that favour the parasite. In summary alpha-GalCer protection against T. cruzi required multiple cellular responses, but not the response of NK cells. These results provide useful information because alpha-GalCer is being developed as therapy for infections, autoimmune diseases, allergy and cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据