4.6 Article

Effects of subchronic exposure to static magnetic field on testicular function in rats

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 947-952

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.06.004

关键词

static magnetic field; testosterone; oxidative stress; spermatogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of static magnetic field (SMF) exposure on testicular function, antioxidant status and DNA oxidation in rats. Methods. Male adult rats were exposed to SMF (128 mT; 1 h/day for 30 days). After sacrifice, the epididymal sperm number was counted. Testosterone concentration in plasma and testis was measured by radioimmunoassay. MDA level and GPx, CAT and SOD activities were used as markers of oxidative stress in testis. The 8-oxo-dG level is measured by the HPLC-EC system. Results. Subchronic exposure to SMF has no effect on epididymal sperm count, spermatozoa motility and genital organ weight. In contrast, SMF induces a decrease of testicular and plasmatic testosterone levels, respectively (1.48 +/- 0.56 vs. 4.66 +/- 0.51 ng/g, p < 0.05; 0.97 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.64 +/- 0.18 ng/mL, p < 0.05). Exposed rats displayed an increase of malondialdehyde (2.01 +/- 0.03 vs. 1.47 +/- 0.06 mu mol/g protein, p < 0.05), metallothioneins (1.04 +/- 0.22 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.06 mu g/g, p < 0.05) and 8-oxo-dG concentrations (3.38 +/- 0.30 vs. 2.36 +/- 0.28 8-oxo-dG/10(6) bases, p < 0.05) in the testis. In the gonad, SMF decreases the CAT (14.33 +/- 1.16 vs. 21.67 +/- 2.05 U/mg protein, p < 0.05), GPx (177.40 +/- 5.97 vs. 237.20 +/- 15.65 U/mg protein, p < 0.05) and mitochondrial Mn-SOD (2.95 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.53 +/- 0.29 U/mg protein, p < 0.05) activities. However, cytosolic CuZn-SOD activity is unaffected. Conclusions. Subchronic exposure to SMF failed to alter spermatogenesis in rat testis. In contrast, the same treatment decreased testosterone levels and induced DNA oxidation. (C) 2006 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据