4.7 Article

Cladribine therapy in refractory celiac disease with aberrant T cells

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 1322-1327

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.07.007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Refractory celiac disease (RCD) may be subdivided into RCD types I and II with phenotypically normal and aberrant intraepithelial T-cell populations, respectively. In RCD II, transition into enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is seen frequently. We have evaluated the effect of cladribine (2-CDA), a purine analogue inducing T-cell depletion, on clinical, histopathologic, and immunologic parameters, as well as the toxicity and side effects in a group of RCD II patients. Methods: Between 2000 and 2005, 17 patients were included (8 men, 9 women). All patients had a clonal rearrangement of the T-cell receptor gamma gene and immunophenotyping showed an aberrant T-cell population lacking surface expression of CD3, CD8, and T-cell receptor alpha beta, in the presence of expression of surface CD103 and intracytoplasmic CD3, Treatment consisted of 2-CDA (0.1 mg/kg/day) intravenously for S days, given in 1-3 courses every 6 months depending on the response. Results: All patients tolerated 2-CDA without serious side effects. Six patients (35.8%) showed a clinical improvement (weight gain, improvement of diarrhea, and hypoalbuminemia). In 10 patients (58.8%) a significant histologic improvement and in 6 patients (35.2%) a significant decrease in aberrant T cells was seen. Seven patients (41.1%) developed EATL and died subsequently. One patient died of progressive refractory state with emaciation. Conclusions: Treatment with 2-CDA in RCD II is feasible, well tolerated, and can induce clinical and histologic improvement as well as a significant decrease of aberrant T cells in a subgroup of patients, albeit it does not prevent EATL development. However, the earlier reported potential risk of precipitating an overt lymphoma should be taken into consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据